World
View
A
world view embodies a complete philosophy or system of beliefs.
A world view includes man's beginning, his purpose in life, his
morals and values, his survival, his liberties (both civil and
religious), a view of his neighbors, and his relations to God,
to war, his earth, the nation and world community.
Christianity
is a world view. Man was created by God for the purpose of worshiping
God, fellowshipping with God, and serving God. Morals and values
are absolutes detailed in God's Word, the Bible. Man is to love
the Lord God with all his heart, mind, and soul, and love his
neighbor as himself. He is to put the will of God above all else,
and the needs of others before his own. Man is steward over the
rest of God's creation. While God gives every person freedom
of choice to do as he chooses with what he is given, every person
will be held accountable by God for the decisions he has made.
Other
world views remove God from the equation, making man man's own
highest authority. This is true of humanism, the primary belief
system being injected into government and education in America today. Its ideas are not new-they have been
around for ages. There is nothing "new" about "New
Age." It has been around since the garden, when mankind
first conceived the idea that he could become like God.
If
the humanist world view is pervading our culture, then Christians
need to fully comprehend that world view both in order to guard
against it and better defend our own. The following pages outline
the basic philosophy of humanism, as described and defined in
their own words (found in Humanist Manifestos I and II).
The Rise of Modern
Culture
Changes
in an entire culture's world view do not happen overnight. Western
culture has been largely a Christian culture since shortly after
the time of Christ. God's revelation has been considered Truth.
Our own nation was founded on the principles and morals of the
Bible. How did that change? What follows is a brief look at the
cultural shift that began with the Renaissance and eventually
led to today's humanistic influence.
Renaissance
"The Renaissance
began in Italy in the 1300s and, over the next two centuries,
spread throughout Europe. It was characterized by great strides in
literature, learning, art, and architecture. Writers and artists
such as Petrarch, Boccaccio, Giotto, and Michelangelo sparked an era of extraordinary
human accomplishment. The Renaissance also marked a significant
shift in human thought. In contrast to the middle
ages (in which the major theme of art, literature, and
philosophy was glorifying and serving God), Renaissance artists
and thinkers exalted man and his abilities. This gave birth to
a doctrine called humanism, which stressed human dignity and
regarded man as the center of all things, the master of his fate,
the captain of his soul-an emphasis that led eventually to an
unbiblical view of man and his relationship to his Creator. As
this way of thinking began to take hold, men and women's dependence
upon God as the source of truth and morality began to wane."
Josh McDowell and
Bob Hostetler, Right from Wrong
Enlightenment
The
Renaissance was followed by the Enlightenment, or the Age of
Reason, which began in the 1600s and lasted through the next
century.
"While the Renaissance
mind acknowledged God (but removed him from the throne, so to
speak, replacing him with man), many leaders of the Enlightenment
(such as Voltaire and Descartes) claimed that if there were a
God who had created the world, he had no contact with it now-which
meant that men and women were left to discover truth on their
own; they could expect no help from God. ... Standards of right
and wrong were not based on the nature and character of God;
they were the products of human reasoning. In the Renaissance,
man (not God) became central; in the Enlightenment, man's reason
became transcendent. The error of the Enlightenment was not in
recognizing human reason as a wonderful thing; it was the attempt
to crown man's reason as king in God's place, refusing to acknowledge
any standard or reality that reason could not fully comprehend
or explain."
Josh McDowell and
Bob Hostetler, Right from Wrong
Industrial Revolution
The
Industrial Revolution overlapped and followed the Enlightenment,
extending from the 1700s through the 1800s.
"It was an explosive
period of human productivity and advancement. The inventions,
innovations, and improvements of the Industrial Age fueled more
than factory furnaces; it stoked the fires of human confidence.
The progress that men and women saw all around them encouraged
them to look to themselves for hope and guidance. Man no longer
felt the need to look upward (to God); he need only look inward
(to himself)."
Josh McDowell and
Bob Hostetler, Right from Wrong
Intellectual Revolution
Then,
in 1859, Charles Darwin published his Origin of the Species,
ushering in a great intellectual revolution. Darwin's theories presented an alternative to a
theistic understanding of origins. God was no longer necessary
to explain or understand how the world and man came to be. These
theories became known as Darwinism.
"This shift in thinking
had succeeded in convincing men and women that they were the
arbiters of truth and morality, not God. Human reason had replaced
God as the object of modern man's worship. Human accomplishments
had made man arrogant and confident in his own abilities to create
good and judge evil. Finally, with the publication and increasing
acceptance of Darwin's theories, God became unnecessary and unwelcome,
leaving man free (in his mind, at least) to judge truth, to reach
his own conclusions about right and wrong independent of God
and his decrees."
"The shift brought
about by these four historical influences-the Renaissance, the Enlightenment,
the Industrial Age, and Darwinism-has resulted in two distinct
models of truth. They reflect two opposite ways of looking at
God and the world: Either truth is defined by God for everyone;
it is objective and absolute; or truth is defined by the individual;
it is subjective (particular to a specific person) and situational
(particular to a given circumstance)."
Josh McDowell and
Bob Hostetler, Right from Wrong
Though
a new world view was developing through several hundred years,
it took some time to trickle into everyday culture. Even early in the
1900s, the storm only loomed on the horizon, but had not yet
broken. The rapid spread of humanism was largely aided in this
past century by the advent of mass media. Francis Schaeffer explained
the slow dissemination of these ideas in his book How Should
We Then Live?
"[The loss of traditional
values] spread in three different ways to people of our own culture
and to people across the world. Geographically, it spread from
the European mainland to England, after a time jumping the Atlantic to the United States. Culturally, it spread in the various disciplines
from philosophy to art, to music, to general culture (the novel,
poetry, drama, films), and to theology. Socially, it spread from
the intellectuals to the educated and then through the mass media
to everyone."
Francis Schaeffer,
How Should We Then Live?
Humanist Manifesto
I
Humanist
Manifestos I and II are the Humanist "Bible." These
two Manifestos are endorsed by the ACLU (American Civil
Liberties Union) and NEA (National Education Association).
A
summary of Humanist Manifesto I follows.
Items in quote marks are directly taken from the Humanist Manifesto.
Others are paraphrased for the sake of brevity and simplicity.
Parenthetical notes after each entry demonstrate how that particular
philosophy translates into the culture.
1) The universe is
self-existing, and not created. (Everything happens
by chance. Evolution is the explanation of the origins of life
and the universe.)
2) Man is a part of nature
and evolved as the result of a continuous process. (Evolution
is man's foundation; Nature is man's revelation, not God.)
3) There is no dualism
of mind and body. (Man does not have a spirit.)
4) Religious culture
is the product of a gradual development due to interaction with
the natural environment and social heritage. The individual born
into a certain culture is largely molded to that culture. (Culture
determines belief and destiny, not God.)
5) The nature of the
universe and science rule out supernatural influence and values.
Science is the only absolute. (The Bible is superfluous and its
moral implications unnecessary, if not immoral themselves in
suggesting an absolute morality.)
6) The complete realization
of the human personality is the end goal of man's life, and personal
development and fulfillment in the here and now is the humanist's
social passion. (Man is good by nature, and equalizing all mankind
is for everyone's good.)
7) "Reasonable attitudes
will be fostered by education and supported by custom. We assume
that humanism will take the path of social and mental hygiene
and discourage sentimental and unreal hopes and wishful thinking." (Man
is dependent only upon himself, and hope in God is "wishful
thinking." Social and mental health are determined by a
person's acceptance of these "reasonable attitudes.")
8) All associations and
institutions exist for the fulfillment of human life. Evaluation,
transformation, control, and direction of such associations and
institutions with a view of enhancing human life is the
purpose of humanism. (The Bible stunts human fulfillment. Humanism
must control education, churches, government, and public media.
All church and religions observations in state, government schools,
courts, and all other institutions must be stopped as quickly
and as subtly as possible. Society must be weaned from God and
morality as a norm.)
9) "Profit-motivated
society has shown itself to be inadequate. ...Socialized and
cooperative economic order must be established to the end that
the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible.
The goal of humanism is a free and universal
society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for
the common good." (Capitalism must be overthrown. World-wide
socialism is the goal. State control by a few intellectuals will
distribute wealth equally to the masses. Those who do not cooperate
would be eliminated for the good of society.)
10) "We assert that
humanism will (a) affirm life rather than deny it; (b) seek to
elicit the possibilities of life, not flee from it; and (c) endeavor
to establish the conditions of a satisfactory life for all, not
merely for the few. By this positive morale and intention, humanism
will be guided, and from this perspective and alignment, the
techniques and efforts of humanism will flow." (Despite
the assertion that humanism will "affirm life," its
teachings include abortion, euthanasia, and the right of an individual
to choose suicide.)
Humanist Manifesto
II
Humanist
Manifesto I (previous pages) was written in 1933 and signed by
humanist Edwin Wilson. Wilson also signed Humanist Manifesto II (below),
which was authored by Dr. Paul Kurtz in 1973. Again, the actual
declaration will be listed (quote marks will be used when the
wording is quoted exactly; other references are paraphrased for
the sake of simplicity and brevity) and the parenthetical note
that follows will explain how that declaration is taught.
Preface to Humanist
Manifesto II:
"As
in 1933, humanists still believe that traditional theism, especially
faith in the prayer-hearing God, assumed to love and care for
persons, to hear and understand their prayers, and to be able
to do something about them, is an unproved and outmoded faith.
Salvationism, based on mere affirmation, still appears as harmful,
diverting people with false hopes of heaven hereafter. Reasonable
minds look to other means for survival.
We
affirm a set of common principles that can serve as a basis for
united action - positive principles relevant to the present human
condition. They are a design for a secular society on a planetary
scale."
1) "We find insufficient
evidence for belief in the existence of a supernatural; it is
either meaningless or irrelevant to question of the survival
and fulfillment of the human race. As non-theists, we begin with
humans not God, nature not deity ..." (God cannot be proved
scientifically, so he must not be real. Even if he were real,
he would be irrelevant to humans. Neither man nor his environment
shows any divine purpose. The only design in all life is accidental
evolution.)
2) "Promises of
immortal salvation or fear of eternal damnation are both illusory
and harmful. ... Science affirms that the human species is an
emergence from natural evolutionary forces." (Man is good, the
need for forgiveness is illusory. The idea of God is harmful
to human development.)
3) "We affirm that
moral values derive their source from human experience. Ethics
is autonomous and situational, needing no theological or ideological
sanction." (Moral values of a moral God must be rejected.
Moral values are individual, based on your own experience. No
standard is needed. Laws must be liberal and tolerate wide differences
in moral values.)
4) Reason and intelligence
are the most effective instruments that humankind possesses.
There is no substitute: neither faith nor passion suffices itself." (Intelligence
and reason are superior to God, Biblical revelation, morality,
and emotion.)
5) "The preciousness
and dignity of the individual person is a central humanist value." (Although
all individuals must submit to the collective needs of society,
the individual must be given high value. Socialism encourages
individual development under controlled conditions, which are
determined to be best for the equality of all.)
6) "In the area
of sexuality, we believe that intolerant attitudes, often cultivated
by orthodox religions and puritanical cultures, unduly repress
sexual conduct. The right to birth control, abortion, and divorce
should be recognized. ... Neither do we wish to prohibit, by
law or social sanction, sexual behavior between consenting adults.
The many varieties of sexual exploration should not in themselves
be considered "evil." ... A
civilized society should be a tolerant one. Short of harming
others or compelling them to do likewise, individuals should
be permitted to express their sexual proclivities and pursue
their lifestyles as they desire. (All sexual activities, including
homosexuality and all sex outside of marriage, should be permitted,
accepted, and taught to children as "normal.")
7) "To enhance freedom
and dignity the individual must experience a full range of civil
liberties in all societies. This includes freedom of speech and
the press, political democracy, the legal right of opposition
to governmental policies, fair judicial process, religious liberty,
freedom of association, and artistic, scientific, and cultural
freedom. It also includes recognition of an individual's right
to die with dignity, euthanasia, and the right to suicide." (Civil
liberties are the key issues to popular support. Freedom of speech
is lauded, but Christian clubs must not be able to meet on any
public forum. They cannot be allowed in the free speech arena,
because religious views would cause secular chaos.)
8) "The separation
of church and state and the separation of ideology and state
are imperative." (Everything religious removed from textbooks,
teaching, prayer, government, etc.)
9) "Individuals
should be encouraged to contribute to their own betterment. If
unable, then society should provide means to satisfy their basic
economic health and cultural needs, including, wherever resources
make it possible, a minimum guaranteed annual income." (Implementation
of a socialist economy.)
10) "We deplore
the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. ... The best
option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and
to move toward the building of a world community."
11) "This world
must renounce the resort to violence and force as a method of
solving international disputes. ... War is obsolete. ... It is
a planetary imperative to reduce the level of military expenditures
and turn these savings to peaceful and people-oriented uses." (Who
could disagree with this? It is a rallying point, as most people
agree that war is bad. Disarmament, however, presents a whole
different set of problems ...)
12) "Technology
is a vital key to human progress and development. ... We would
resist any moves to censor basic scientific research on moral,
political, or social grounds." (Genetic engineering and
other questionable scientific and medical practices would be
allowed and encouraged.)
13) "In closing,
commitment to all humankind transcends the narrow allegiances
of church, state, party, class, or race in moving toward a wider
vision of human potentiality ... We urge that parochial loyalties
and inflexible moral and religious ideologies be transcended.
... The true revolution is occurring and can continue in countless
non-violent adjustments." (Concepts of humanism are held
out as the world's only hope. All church loyalties must be transcended
with the true revolution of non-violent socialism. Although violent
means must be used to achieve these ends, it is not intended
to be furthered when the socialist goals are established.)
"Education is thus
a most powerful ally of Humanism, and every American public school is a school of Humanism."
Charles Francis Potter,
humanist quoted in
Boston Herald Courier, Jan.
24, 1982
"Neutral education
is therefore impossible. Teaching knowledge
without God IS the religion of Humanism."
Bill Gothard,
How to Understand the Purpose Behind Humanism
"Atheists who consistently
try to live without God tend to commit suicide or go insane.
Those who are inconsistent live on in the ethical or aesthetic
shadow of Christian truth while they deny the reality that made
the shadow."
Norman Geisler |